Skip to main content

A Question For Herman Cain- Would the 999 plan work better as a 99 Plan ?

I like Herman Cain but I have some questions that I would like to see him answer.

The 999 plan is not about numbers- it is about percentages- which result in numbers and so if you take one of the percentages out of the equation,it does not necessarily result in a lower federal revenue number- and so I raise the question- why do we need three elements to this equation?

Is there a point to the national federal sales tax other than to tax those who are not making an income- the unemployed, the disabled, and those living on a fixed retirement amount - and to "tax the rich" more than others. Other than that, the sales tax is levied on the same sectors as those taxed by the other 2 nines.

The sales tax lowers the value of the dollar as the cost of consumer goods is increased by 9%. The sales tax 9% will potentially lower business profits by raising costs of wholesale purchases resulting from an increase in the cost of freight- and by decreasing consumer spending power. Business profits generate the number on which the 9% business tax is calculated. If the business pays the employee more to compensate for the inflated cost of almost everything caused by 9% sales tax- the number used to calculate personal income tax increases by the same amount that that number used to calculate business tax decreases. This is true with or without the 9% sales tax.

Without the 9% sales tax, all dollars retain their spending value. Since business no longer have to pay a tax calculated on the number of employees and wages paid to those employees, businesses have more capital for hiring new employees and that decreases the number of unemployed who then increase the number who pay a 9% tax personal income tax. It still leaves other unemployed people not paying a tax but a good portion of those people are retired or disabled. What is the reason for taxing the resources of these people especially when it might slow down job creation by reducing the spending power of those individuals and thus keep more people in the unemployed segment?

The "999" slogan rings like equality for all, but the federal sales tax conceals a "tax the rich" ideology when the guiding ideology should be job creation. The federal sales tax could potentially result in less consumer spending and therefore fewer jobs.

While the 9% business tax eliminates the unfair advantage of businesses that hire under the table- the federal sales tax re-introduces the unfair advantage for system beaters with the likelihood that a non-taxable under ground market for consumer goods will develop or expand under this system and compete with consumer goods that are sold by businesses that play by the rules. This will create the need for a government bureaucracy designed to catch the cheaters and funded by the taxpayer.

A national federal sales tax creates competition between the federal government and the states. Will some states have to lower their state sales tax in order to compete? If the federal government decides to raise or lower the federal sales tax- that impacts the sales taxing policies of all the state governments. I do not think that is a good thing for state sovereignty.

A 99 plan combined with a more specific federal plan for reducing federal spending than Cain has thus far offered could be streamlined for job creation without a hidden class warfare ideology.

This still leaves other questions unanswered such as the financing of social security and for constitutional purists there still remains the issue of the constitutionality of income tax. In this election candidates should have a long term plan for realigning this nation with the constitutional model created by our framers- or to say why they do not believe in that model.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Incomplete Theory of Inflation Made to Order for Mass Consumption.

M oney is not what it used to be, so must our ways of thinking about it adapt. jaakko-kemppainen-unsplash The message treads across the media terrain, beating louder and louder as if to drown out the beat of the distant drummer. W arning! The only thing the stimulus will stimulate is inflation. The people will pay as the wealthy elite invests their windfalls in financial assets. Doom and gloom set to march across the land to the beat of the distribution of stimulus funds. In recent years as past predictions of fiscal disaster following stimulus spending failed to materialize and so the thinking about national debt and deficits has evolved, most noticeably with the development of  Modern Monetary Theory . In the   fall of 2020,  National Affairs  published a story,  Does the Debt Matter ? by Peter Wehner & Ian Tufts. Peter Wehner is vice president and senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and served in the last three Republican administrations. Ian Tufts is a recent g

Why are social impact investors trying so hard to defeat smaller shelters for the homeless?

  "Social Impact” developers in Portland, Maine seek to squelch a referendum for smaller shelters called for by qualified practitioners with concrete experience in the field. A large sign says Vote C to support the Homeless, small handmade sign next to it says Untrue! That sign is paid for by developers who want / Photo by Jess Falero In   the 1970s under Governor Longley , Maine became a centrally managed economy that expanded Maine’s wealth gap and merged, almost seamlessly, the public and private and the non-profit and for-profit economic sectors into one mutually beneficial wealth-concentration & distribution system. Currently, mutually benefitting factions are coming together once again in hopes of building a mega-shelter for the homeless in a Portland, Maine industrial development district. In addition to beds for the homeless, the project will include, dining, and locker facilities, as well as offices and an attached health clinic. The promotion  describes the facility

JECD Group Holds Master Plan Pow Wow for Boothbay Peninsula

The most honest statement to come out of the ringleaders of the Joint Economic Community Development Group in their first workshop program was "none of us are experts on economic development", which in my most humble opinion is evident in the fact that the JECD begins with the premise that economic development can be master minded by central management. The article in the Boothbay Register begins with this paragraph: The Joint Economic Development Committee master plan workshop on Thursday, Oct. 12 discuss findings from stakeholder interviews conducted early last month. The interviews centered around building an overall economic development strategy for Edgecomb, Boothbay, Boothbay Harbor and Southport. Who are the stakeholders?  A search for articles in the Boothbay Register comes up short. Why is the public not told who the stakeholders are. Since the taxpayers of Boothbay and Boothbay Harbor footed the bill for the JECD's consultants, why are they not the stakeh