Skip to main content

Missing The Point - An Attempt to Abolish LURK is Transformed into A Modification Of LURK

A Guest Op Ed By Roger Ek,
Republican Town Chairman for the Town of Lee

LURK LEGISLATION UNDER DISCUSSION




                                                Paintings by Michael Blaze Petan

Bigger Stronger Meaner

Over 40 years ago, the Maine legislature decided that the residents of the Unorganized Territories should not be allowed to govern themselves. They would be better off if they were controlled by seven appointed members of a commission. At the time, a legislator from Aroostook County said that such a bill would cause poverty throughout Northern Maine. He was right. The bill creating LURC passed by one vote. 

Two years ago during a television interview of the seven Republican candidate for governor, the moderator asked if the candidate were to significantly cut back or eliminate a state agency which one it would be. Paul LePage answered, "LURC." Last year Rep. Jeff Gifford introduced legislation to do just that. The legislature did what it usually does when a bill is controversial. They did it when the COMPACT was proposed. They established a committee to study the bill. 

On Tuesday, January 10, the committee presented their recommendation to the Agriculture and Forestry Committee in Augusta. The result was astoundingly arrogant. As proposed by the committee, the new  "jurisdiction-wide" LURC would be bigger, stronger and meaner. The size of the commission would increase from seven to nine, but every position could still be appointed. The people in the UTs would not be allowed to nominate or elect these people. 

The onerous CLUP would remain intact and all existing and proposed plans would remain in effect. They rub salt in the wound. LURC would continue to "discourage the intermixing of incompatible activities." 'Incompatible" in whose opinion?  Why can't the owner decide if he wants to live beside his business? They speak about "well managed land use". In whose opinion? Certainly not the landowner. 

After the new LURC has consolidated its new powers for three years, counties could beg LURC to manage their own lands. Such plans would need to be approved by LURC and the DEP. You see, the DEP gets more powerful too. In order for a future county CLUP to be approved by the DEP, unorganized townships near "service center communities" would be governed by the service center community, not the citizens who actually live in the townships. Even then the DEP would control the regional CLP. 

The proposed new LURC would require more people to be hired into a bigger bureaucracy. Before serving on a county planning board for example, the DEP would determine which and how citizens have "demonstrated capacity" to serve. There are thousands of talented responsible people living in the Unorganized Territories.. It is incredibly arrogant that an outside state staff believes they have a right to approve the election of local and county officials. We elect legislators without DEP approval. We can elect country planning boards without DEP approval. When we elect citizens to positions in government, those officials do not need to be endorsed or approved by the DEP - yet. Is this something the DEP wants to establish state-wide? 

The goal of Rep. Gifford's bill was to abolish LURC and reestablish freedom in the Unorganized Territories. Nowhere in the new "super-committee" vision for Northern Maine are the words freedom, liberty, self determination or economic development. It appears that nine out of the thirteen members of the super-committee that drafted this power grab have very close ties to the environmental industry. They have obviously not read or completely disregard the Maine Constitution. As the legislature begins consideration of how to deal with the existing LURC, I recommend that they begin at the beginning with Article 1, Section 1 of the Maine Constitution.

I beseech  the legislature to reject this report in its entirety and in the unlikely event that it passes the legislature, that Governor Paul LePage keeps his promise and vetoes the bill. The futures of the citizens in the Unorganized Territories depend on it. 

Roger Ek
Lee, Maine
       ///,        ////
              \  /,      /  >./    For those that have fought for it,
               \  /,   _/  /.      Freedom has a flavor the protected
                \_  /_/   /.      will never know.
                 \__/_   <
                 /<<< \_\_         Roger W. Ek
                /,)^>>_._ \        Republican Town Chairman
                (/   \\ /\\\             Town of Lee, Maine
                      // ````       
           ====((`=====    mequest@telplus.net          Molon Labe

Though our Constitution defends us, it cannot defend itself. 

We the People are tasked with that solemn responsibility.
===========================================================================

This is the Response from Chris Gardner and the general discussion at As Maine Goes of Rofer Eks Editorial in the Sun Journal.


LURK LEGISLATION UNDER DISCUSSION

 Land Use Regulation Links



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Communism and State Ownership of Intellectual Property

Tweet This: http://goo.gl/BcA6ru Government As a Secret Society The response to my informal suggestion that public accessibility to government could be improved by making information available in a searchable data base ( see previous post) subjectively confirmed that the  functioning power elite of Maine's economic development programs and policies are both intentional in instituting a political ideology that supersedes the will of the people, as expressed in the Maine State Constitution, and deceptive towards the general public. 1.Information made available on an agency website but not in a searchable database format may not provide the research and investigative tool needed by the public. The Freedom of Access Act does not require that public information be posted online in any particular format, just that public records be made available. While there is a strong argument for increasing the accessibility and usefulness of information, there is no current requ

An Incomplete Theory of Inflation Made to Order for Mass Consumption.

M oney is not what it used to be, so must our ways of thinking about it adapt. jaakko-kemppainen-unsplash The message treads across the media terrain, beating louder and louder as if to drown out the beat of the distant drummer. W arning! The only thing the stimulus will stimulate is inflation. The people will pay as the wealthy elite invests their windfalls in financial assets. Doom and gloom set to march across the land to the beat of the distribution of stimulus funds. In recent years as past predictions of fiscal disaster following stimulus spending failed to materialize and so the thinking about national debt and deficits has evolved, most noticeably with the development of  Modern Monetary Theory . In the   fall of 2020,  National Affairs  published a story,  Does the Debt Matter ? by Peter Wehner & Ian Tufts. Peter Wehner is vice president and senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and served in the last three Republican administrations. Ian Tufts is a recent g

Its Not the Economy, Its the Culture!

Trump has brought into focus a long brewing social crisis SELECTED FOR THE BEST OF TREMR darren-deloach-unsplash I was a Republican, until the 2016 convention when a petition gathered enough signatures to let delegates vote their conscience, and was promptly dismissed by a voice vote.  That was when I first became aware that the Republican party was afraid, intimidated and dominated by the Trump base. I felt the party took the traditional base of the party, which included myself, for granted, as if we were party players, guaranteed to support the party, unquestionably, no matter where it went. Deeply ro o ted party obedience has been established. Many whom I once respected and are no longer recognizable. Those of us who did not follow the leaders no longer have a place in the Republican party and have largely become Independents. I voted straight blue in the last election, but consider myself Independent. There is no reason to believe that either one party or the other will continue to