Skip to main content

Boothbay's New Mini-Turnpike- Not for Your Driving Pleasure!

I have now driven around the new traffic configuration at the Boothbay Center from both directions, enough to know that even at times with no traffic I prefer to avoid it. The curves are cramped as the country road is transformed into a mini-turnpike, that driving experience I am so relieved to leave behind when one takes the turn onto the peninsula. Driving on our small town roads seems rational until one encounters this new web of yielding points with traffic converging from all directions.

The first time I drove through the new turnpike was during the daytime hours There was an unusually long wait to get through a stretch of road which was formerly a breeze, especially when there were no events taking place in the park. I gave the traffic jam the benefit of the doubt, imagining that it was occurring from still ongoing construction taking place somewhere that I could not see. I waited a very long time for traffic to pass by so that the cars I was following could yield into the pattern. There are no traffic lights to provide a break when a long trail of cars is already in the circle. The four way stop has been moved and reconfigured to cause blockage on the main through way.

I was recently told that before the obstruction was built there were long waits in the summer due to traffic coming from the Botanical Gardens. Although I frequently drove the route at various times of the day, I had never encountered the heavy traffic, but it seems obvious that re-configuring the road does not change the amount of traffic using the road. In the old configuration, cars coming from the side road merged with the main route. Now drivers on the central through way have to wait to  merge with the traffic coming from the side roads. Or it can be looked at another way. Roads going to and from the Botanical Gardens and the Boothbay Harbor Country Club are now treated as the main through way and the road going to and from town is the side road. What does that tells us about central planning's vision for our community?

Coming from the direction going into town, the road feels even more congested as one has an open view of two closely situated yielding points coming from either side. There was no traffic when I passed through but it appeared that I was travelling on the lane into which which all others merge. It felt unpleasant. inelegant, and dangerous in a way that I never felt with the old four way stop.

The old system was respectful of cars traveling the less traveled lanes. The four way stop means that cars driving on the less traveled roads do not have to wait for all cars coming from a more heavily traveled direction. There was a natural order to the traffic flow. First car to get to the four way intersection goes first. Travelling through the new yielding traffic pattern when traffic is heavy, means one has to wait on the former main drag to enter a cramped circular pattern. How are large flatbed trucks going to negotiate through this tight squeeze?

The contrast between driving on the back roads and trying to get through the new turnpike at the Boothbay Center symbolizes the "two Maines", a term which has a variety of interpretations, and now a new one. There is the Maine that evokes freedom, far from the rat race of urban living, and the Maine that feels manipulative, controlling and rapidly developing into a culture dulled by class snobbery. When travelling on the mini-turnpike, I no longer feel welcome in my home town, When, travelling on the back roads, I reconnect. Frame of mind matters. The Boothbay Center has been transformed into a symbol of dominance of power and money over equality and mutual respect among people. The mini turnpike does not respect the driver. It rules the driver with new traffic patterns created in the interests of two new behemoths.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How The MPERS Contract Came To Be Embedded in the Maine Constitution

Is The Maine Public Retirement System Unconstitutional? According to the Maine Public Employees ComprehensiveFinancial Report of 2010 , the Maine Public Employees Retirement System was established in 1942 to provide services for retiring public employees. No information is given about how the Public Employees Retirement System was legally structured in 1942. In the report MPERS is described as “an independent public agency of the State of Maine that traces its history to 1942”. Wikipedia  uses the same term but when the link is clicked it reveals that Wikipedia has no idea what " independent public agency " means.  An online search for history of MPERS between 1942 and 1985 comes up empty.  In 1985 during the administration of Governor Joseph E Brennan, the Maine Legislature passed a statute announcing its intentions of using general taxpayer monies to provide for retirement funds and death benefits for public employees, a faction which, incidentally, includes th...

High Brow Art VS the Marketplace and the Maine Juice Conference

TWEET THIS http://goo.gl/xdwZDk Continuing with my story from HERE ...(and incorporating a few paragraphs from this earlier but incomplete telling ) Finally, after a year of receiving stimulus fund notices for non-profits only, in the fall of 2009, I received an email from the Maine Arts Commission about a competition for small businesses for what I took to be, a modest grant for the sum of 30000.00 from an "anonymous source". In a moment of hopeful delusions, I imagined that the Maine Arts Commission had come to its senses and realized that they needed to support the private sector. The competition was called an "elevator pitch competition" which means a pitch delivered in five minutes. Even the written answers to questions on the application were required to be answered in a minimal number of words, brevity being stressed as being so important that if your couldn't explain a business idea in five minutes, then one's business idea is simply not ...

Statutory Bond Question Requirements Amplify -NOT Negate Maine Constituion

TWEET THIS http://goo.gl/VcBj8O UPDATE NOV 11 2014:  Since I wrote This post- I cam across the statute governing Bond Ratification- as amended by the 2013 legislature It looks to be that the sentence "To meet the requirement that the signed statement of the Treasurer of State accompany any ballot question for ratification of a bond issue, the statement may be printed on the ballot" was amended by adding this "or it may be printed as a separate document that is made available to voters as provided in Title 21-A, sections 605-A and 651" Section 605-A no longer exists and I am tracking it down. Section 651 says it can be posted outside the guardrail which separates voters from the rest of the world. I am writing a new post to cover this new information Update Nov 12, 2014!   The link I originally referenced is here ,  THIS IS HOW THE LAW WAS WRITTEN IN  2011 - showing the process of incrementalism at play In this link  part of the sentence below is s...