Skip to main content

Maine Biz Uses Claims Made by Government Chartered Non-Profit Corporation To Support Legislature's Side in Bond Debate

Maine Biz has an article on the Governor's Veto and uses the Maine Development Foundation as one of their sources on behalf of the legislature.


This is my online comment to that article.

MTI- Maine Technological Institute is BOTH government and non-profit. It is a non-profit corporation chartered by special act of legislation in violation of the Maine State Constitution, which our legislature routinely ignores as it continues to entrench a network of special corporations chartered by special acts of legislation. Article IV, Part Third Section 14 of the Maine State Constitution prohibits the legislature from chartering corporations by special act of legislation with an exception for municipal purposes and - an almost never applicable exception - for something that can't be done any other way.

Article IV Part Third Section 14 of the Maine State constitution then goes on to say that all corporations, however formed , are subject to general law. However corporate records are generally found at the Bureau of Corporations but this is not true for special corporations formed by special act of legislation. Those records are stashed away at the legislature's library which serves as the corporate headquarters depository of corporate records for the corporate state - all of which is government.

The Maine Development Foundation is another non-profit corporation chartered by special act of legislation. To quote from Title 10 Chapter 107 of the Maine statutes:

The foundation shall exist as a not-for-profit corporation with a public purpose, and the exercise by the foundation of the powers conferred by this chapter shall be deemed and held to be an essential governmental function. [1977, c. 548, §1 (NEW).]


The Maine Development Foundation is a kind of head honcho of the corporate state, giving birth to a vast network of government chartered corporations each with their own special funds- usually called "the fund" in each special charter. The funds are frequently replenished with tax payer dollars and money from any source the legislature can concoct. They are depository of redistributed wealth. There now exists in Maine a deeply entrenched network of such depositories all to the benefit of the legislature's "targeted sector", which includes some and excludes others creating one economic sector which is taxed without being represented and another that is represented without being taxed.

When Maine media publishes the opinion of the Maine Economic Development Foundation it is using one hand of government to endorse the other hand of government- both of those hands representing non-profit corporations unconstitutionally chartered by the Maine State legislature. If taxpayer money is going to government chartered non-profit corporations, then how can it be that the taxpayer sees a return on their investment? MTI does give grants to for profit private enterprises. This is essentially capital that MTI accumulates in part through non-profit sources and then redistributes to private interests in the legislature's "targeted sector"- but this does not constitute a return on the investment for the taxpayer- it is a free windfall for private interests in the legislature's "targeted sector" which is that sector which suits the legislature's grand design for the way Maine should be- a design that is created and implemented from the top down.

It is time for this to be a substantive debate. Government sources that support the legislature's claims are self-referential. The entire network of corporations chartered by special acts of legislation is just one big corporate state network whose records are all likely to be found in the legislature's library. This is the real source that needs to be investigated to get to the truth of the matter. If the media will not make this debate the substantive debate that it needs to be, then the people should by calling the legislature's library and requesting the records.

Special Act of legislation Chartering MTI
Special Act of Legislation Chartering The Maine Development Foundation

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Incomplete Theory of Inflation Made to Order for Mass Consumption.

M oney is not what it used to be, so must our ways of thinking about it adapt. jaakko-kemppainen-unsplash The message treads across the media terrain, beating louder and louder as if to drown out the beat of the distant drummer. W arning! The only thing the stimulus will stimulate is inflation. The people will pay as the wealthy elite invests their windfalls in financial assets. Doom and gloom set to march across the land to the beat of the distribution of stimulus funds. In recent years as past predictions of fiscal disaster following stimulus spending failed to materialize and so the thinking about national debt and deficits has evolved, most noticeably with the development of  Modern Monetary Theory . In the   fall of 2020,  National Affairs  published a story,  Does the Debt Matter ? by Peter Wehner & Ian Tufts. Peter Wehner is vice president and senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and served in the last three Republican administrations. Ian Tufts is a recent g

JECD Group Holds Master Plan Pow Wow for Boothbay Peninsula

The most honest statement to come out of the ringleaders of the Joint Economic Community Development Group in their first workshop program was "none of us are experts on economic development", which in my most humble opinion is evident in the fact that the JECD begins with the premise that economic development can be master minded by central management. The article in the Boothbay Register begins with this paragraph: The Joint Economic Development Committee master plan workshop on Thursday, Oct. 12 discuss findings from stakeholder interviews conducted early last month. The interviews centered around building an overall economic development strategy for Edgecomb, Boothbay, Boothbay Harbor and Southport. Who are the stakeholders?  A search for articles in the Boothbay Register comes up short. Why is the public not told who the stakeholders are. Since the taxpayers of Boothbay and Boothbay Harbor footed the bill for the JECD's consultants, why are they not the stakeh

Why are social impact investors trying so hard to defeat smaller shelters for the homeless?

  "Social Impact” developers in Portland, Maine seek to squelch a referendum for smaller shelters called for by qualified practitioners with concrete experience in the field. A large sign says Vote C to support the Homeless, small handmade sign next to it says Untrue! That sign is paid for by developers who want / Photo by Jess Falero In   the 1970s under Governor Longley , Maine became a centrally managed economy that expanded Maine’s wealth gap and merged, almost seamlessly, the public and private and the non-profit and for-profit economic sectors into one mutually beneficial wealth-concentration & distribution system. Currently, mutually benefitting factions are coming together once again in hopes of building a mega-shelter for the homeless in a Portland, Maine industrial development district. In addition to beds for the homeless, the project will include, dining, and locker facilities, as well as offices and an attached health clinic. The promotion  describes the facility