Skip to main content

Fiscal Information Required by Maine Constitution to Accompany Bond Questions

TWEET THIS: http://goo.gl/H6bdsd




























Continuing my investigation into the constitutional bond ratification process : This looks like the fiscal information which is constitutionally  required to accompany the bond questions . This information is found on the Maine Treasurer's report to the Maine legislature.
Treasurer Douglass's February 12, 2014 Bond Update to MaineLegislature:
Honorable Members of the 126th Maine Legislature:

Update on General Obligation Bonds: $52M funded to date; $84M total expected in FY2014; $78M requested in Q1 FY 2015
 excerpt:
Here are some additional facts about Maine General Obligation Bonds:
• Maine GO bonds are traditionally structured to mature in 10 years,
with two payments per year after the initial borrowing.
• AU bonds expire after 5 years if not issued, but may be reauthorized
for 2 years by the Legislature.*
• GO bonds are issued by the State Treasurer with the full faith and
credit of the State.
• The State Treasurer has constitutional power to pay debt first out of
revenues.*
• Maine’s Constitution prohibits using bonds to pay for current
operations.*

Constitutional provisions are from Art V, Pt 3, Sec 5 and Art IX, Sec 14.


This paragraph plus the statement at the top of the report looks like the information that constitution requires to accompany the bond questions. Clearly it would not be difficult to include these short paragraphs on the ballot - the simplest and most accessible way to comply with the Maine Constitution
In June 2013, Maine had $104.5 million in outstanding Authorized but Unissued Bonds. In November 2013, voters ratified $150 million in additional bonds. The total Authorized but Unissued Bonds now amount
to $254.5 million. Treasurer's Bond Update to legislature



Article IX.General Provisions.
Section 14.  Authority and procedure for issuance of bonds. 
Whenever ratification by the electors is essential to the validity of bonds to be issued on behalf of the State, the question submitted to the electors shall be accompanied by a statement setting forth the total amount of bonds of the State outstanding and unpaid, the total amount of bonds of the State authorized and unissued, and the total amount of bonds of the State contemplated to be issued if the enactment submitted to the electors be ratified.  

a statement setting forth the total amount of bonds of the State outstanding and unpaid

In June 2013, Maine had $104.5 million in outstanding Authorized but Unissued Bonds.

the total amount of bonds of the State authorized and unissued,

The total Authorized but Unissued Bonds now ( Feb 12, 2014) amount to $254.5 million.

and the total amount of bonds of the State contemplated to be issued if the enactment submitted to the electors be ratified.  

$84M total expected in FY2014; $78M requested in Q1 FY 2015 (see top of report-also this page)


These two paragraphs could almost fit in a tweet- why was it necessary to pass a new statute deeming them to be placed anywhere out side of the voting area?

And am I reading correctly that between June and November of 2013- the bond debt went up 150%? Could this have anything to do with the passing of the "Expanded and Improved Seed Capital Tax Credit" in the fall of 2013 which multiplies the rate at which the legislature can transfer taxpayer money to capitalists by eight-fold- a minor fact not reported in he media?

See Also  

Maine Legislature's Intentional Lack of Transparency Meets the Gruber Model

LEGISLATING A RUN AROUND THE MAINE CONSTITUTION



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why are social impact investors trying so hard to defeat smaller shelters for the homeless?

  "Social Impact” developers in Portland, Maine seek to squelch a referendum for smaller shelters called for by qualified practitioners with concrete experience in the field. A large sign says Vote C to support the Homeless, small handmade sign next to it says Untrue! That sign is paid for by developers who want / Photo by Jess Falero In   the 1970s under Governor Longley , Maine became a centrally managed economy that expanded Maine’s wealth gap and merged, almost seamlessly, the public and private and the non-profit and for-profit economic sectors into one mutually beneficial wealth-concentration & distribution system. Currently, mutually benefitting factions are coming together once again in hopes of building a mega-shelter for the homeless in a Portland, Maine industrial development district. In addition to beds for the homeless, the project will include, dining, and locker facilities, as well as offices and an attached health clinic. The promotion  describes the ...

Mayor LePage on Baldacci Reducing Funding To Municipalities

Tweet This  http://goo.gl/Et0wWS As Governor, LePage seems on track to implement the Steve Woods plan of nudging the inhabitants of rural towns to move into urban centers. Steve Woods was then the would be CEO of the corporate state. In the video Mr Woods explains that the inhabitants of 108 Maine Towns are not serving the corporation as they should be. Mr Woods says the 108 municipalities of Maine are costing the  corporation five times as much as the corporations recieves from these instrumentalities in sales tax revenue. Mr Woods speaks as a man managing a corporation not as a would be Governor of a state. He speaks in calm Obamaesque tones signaling that we can surely trust this erudite man so pro-active for the cause of state corporatism . The corporate state replaced Maine's constitution back in 1976 when Governor Longely called in the heads of Maine industry to restructure Maine as corporatio n, kicking the old fashioned Maine constitution out of ...

FaceBook Blocking- in-Q-Tel and the Private Hegemony Of Power

TWEET THIS:  http://goo.gl/9y2MiH  Recently a message appeared  on my screen , being identified as from Facebook. It brought up the Facebook login screen and warned against sending friend requests to people that one does not know in one's circle of friends , family, work, and classmates I first received the message several months ago. The first message included a list of twenty names of people who did not respond to my friend request over all the years that I have been on Facebook. It asked that I delete all the requests and suggested that I stop sending friend requests for a week. The next was a list of 7 names - some of them very recent requests, which I did not think were given adequate response time. The third message to appear  told  that I am blocked for a week from adding friends and displayed a list of five names- all very recent requests- all in response to those with whom I interacted on Facebook- and one within the last hour of receiving t...